arXiv (All)
open access
GroundedGEO: Auditing the Evidence Gap in Generative Search Rankings
Generative search systems rank products and services for consequential decisions, and publishers can cheaply make candidate text look relevant. Yet evidence status is not a text property but a claim-evidence relation: text-only rankers and defenses cannot separate honest detailed content from fabric
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Diagnosing LLM Reranker Behavior Under Fixed Evidence Pools#984997
- SumRank: Aligning Summarization Models for Long-Document Listwise Reranking#998158
- From Rubrics to Reliable Scores: Evidence-Grounded Text Evaluation with LLM Judges#987553
- How Calibration Content Shapes Attention-Based Reranking#1011486
- What Can a Leaderboard Certify? Compositional Controllability for Fair Evaluation and Training of Biomedical Literature-Review Agents#1116649
Record · ID 1051682
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive