CanLII
metadata only
De Longte v. De Longte
Decided: 2026-09-21. Docket: M57536; COA-24-CV-0764; COA-26-CV-0035; M57537. Citation: 2026 ONCA 656 (CanLII). Family — Appeals — Trial judgment — Equalization — Corporation valuation in equalization calculation — Appellant sought appellate reweighing of evidence and raised ineffective assistance of counsel — Trial reasons found clear and comprehensive — No palpable and overriding error shown — Appeals dismissed | Procedure — Appeals — Standard of review — Reasons — Appellate deference to fact-finding absent palpable and overriding error — Sufficiency of reasons for appellate review — Ineffective assistance of trial counsel in civil matters limited to “rarest of cases”, D.W. v. White, OZ Merchandizing Inc. v. Canadian Professional Soccer League Inc. — Appeal dismissed | Procedure — Post-ju
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Marlin c. R.#824293
- Buck Estate v. Canada (Attorney General)#976597
- Law Society of Alberta v Smith#1166781
- Can LLMs Reason in a Legally Meaningful Manner? A Small-scale Study on European Court of Human Rights Cases#1048777
- Law Society of Alberta v Billingsley#638443
Record · ID 1053800
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive