CanLII
metadata only
Buck Estate v. Canada (Attorney General)
Decided: 2026-09-14. Docket: A-130-25. Citation: 2026 FCA 153 (CanLII). Procedure — Appeals — Federal Courts Rules, Rule 51 — Standard of review — Whether the Associate Judge committed an error of law or palpable and overriding error — “Strong tactical burden” where Federal Court appears to have given a complete answer — Requests to reweigh the evidence rejected — Appeal dismissed with costs | Procedure — Confidentiality order — Open court principle — Sherman Estate v. Donovan — Whether the confidentiality order should be set aside for not explicitly setting out the controlling legal test — Federal Courts Act, s. 52(b)(i), power to make the decision that should have been made — Distinguishing Fletcher v. Ontario on these facts — Appeal dismissed with costs | Evidence — Settlement privilege
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Aldahleh v. Zayed#1066670
- De Longte v. De Longte#1053800
- Duarte Berganza v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1066667
- Zai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#928681
- The Influence of Court Judgments on Non-State Law#10736
Record · ID 976597
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive