CanLII
metadata only
Terrigno v Weal
Decided: 2026-09-17. Docket: 2501-0355AC. Citation: 2026 ABCA 300 (CanLII). Professional responsibility — Counsel disqualification — Advocate-witness rule — Right to retain and continue with counsel of choice balanced against repute of the administration of justice — Law Society of Alberta Code of Conduct, rule 5.2-1 considered as public policy — Removal of counsel and firm where counsel is depicted in videos — Appeal dismissed | Professional responsibility — Test for removal — Public confidence — Whether proper consideration is fair-minded reasonably informed member of the public — Whether removal requires lawyer “likely” to be a witness and not a mere possibility — Hazelwood v Schlotter and Forward applied — No misinterpretation of applicable law — Appeal dismissed | Professional respons
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Gutierrez v. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Canada#1120804
- Yenovkian v. Shirtliff-Hinds Professional Corporation#976606
- 28 U.S.C. § 596 — Removal of an independent counsel; termination of office#557167
- McCormack v Alberta (Attorney General)#638440
- 28 U.S.C. § 2515 — New trial; stay of judgment#556728
Record · ID 1053817
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive