Yenovkian v. Shirtliff-Hinds Professional Corporation

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, onca, 2026onca650, 2026 onca 650 (canlii), 2026, onca, 650, (canlii), coa-26-cv-0244; m57543, 2026, procedure, stay pending leave to appeal, interim relief, rjr, macdonald inc. v. canada (attorney general) factors, whether the moving party met the three, factor test to stay the panel review order under supreme court act, s. 65.1(2), interests of justice assessment, motion dismissed, statutory interpretation, supreme court act, leave to appeal, supreme court act, s. 40(1), whether the “serious issue to be tried” requirement must be assessed in light of public or national importance, no issue of public or national importance identified, threshold not met, stay refused, procedure, irreparable harm, security for costs, whether irreparable harm shown from complying with the security for costs order, claimed investment liquidation, currency conversion, lost returns, harm quantifiable and remediable by costs, irreparable harm misconceived as non, compliance consequence, stay refused, procedure, balance of convenience, interests of justice, whether balance of convenience favoured granting a stay, appeal found frivolous and vexatious, no assets in ontario to satisfy potential costs order, greater harm to responding party if stay granted, stay refused