ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Evaluation of Self-adhesive Hybrid Resin Composite Compared to a Traditional Composite Resin in Restorations of NCCLs
This is a split-mouth randomized clinical investigation conducted to evaluate clinical performances of a self-adhesive hybrid resin composite (investigational medical device Surefil) compared to a traditional composite resin, when used for direct restorations of non-carious lesions (NCCLs). The study consists of a 3-year long follow-up period.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fil Hybrid Composite in Primary Molars#875574
- Permanent Resin Restorations Fabricated by Three Dimension Printer#896854
- Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Versus Conventional Injectable Flowable Resin Composite Restorations in Class I Carious Cavities#895618
- Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Two Nano Ceramic Resin Composite in Class I Cavities#912683
- Clinical Assessment of Giomer Based Technology Versus Smart Bioactive Restoration in Carious Class V Cavities#915982
Record · ID 1058952
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive