ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Two Nano Ceramic Resin Composite in Class I Cavities
in patients with Class I Cavities, will the use of Zenit Nano Ceramic Composite restorations have similar clinical performance to conventional Ceram-X Nano Ceramic Composite restorations, evaluation of restorations will be done at baseline, six, and twelve months using Modified USPHS Ryge criteria.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.#1151879
- Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite in Posterior Restorations#1087735
- Comparing Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks With Ceramic Blocks in Indirect Restorations 2. Protocol Registration:#1161356
- Self-Cure vs. Highly Filled Flowable Composite in Carious Cervical Lesions: 18-Month RCT#861587
- Evaluation of Self-adhesive Hybrid Resin Composite Compared to a Traditional Composite Resin in Restorations of NCCLs#1058952
Record · ID 912683
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive