arXiv (All)
open access
You Should Be Properly Scoring Your Odometry
When we evaluate the performance of our odometry, it is common practice to score the estimated track against a ground truth. Unfortunately, scoring uses point metrics, such as the root mean square error, that ignore the covariance matrix which estimators like filters and smoothers already report. Us
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Autonomous Ground Navigation in Highly Constrained Spaces: Lessons Learned From the Fourth BARN Challenge at ICRA 2025#173984
- BEV-ODOM2: Enhanced BEV-based Monocular Visual Odometry with PV-BEV Fusion and Dense Flow Supervision for Ground Robots#1129114
- Degeneracy-Orthogonal Geometric Constraints for LiDAR SLAM#1131954
- Structural displacement estimation using high-sampling acceleration and temporally-aliased low-sampling vision measurements#472156
- Revisiting Multi-Object Tracking Baselines: Hyperparameter Optimization with Multi-Fidelity Greedy Coordinate Search#1000221
Record · ID 1061527
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive