arXiv (All)
open access
VACS: Value-Aligned Compositional Shielding for Multi-Agent Reasoning
Multi-agent reasoning systems in high-stakes domains must be both accurate and safe, yet agents often follow heterogeneous value priorities (e.g., rigor, conciseness, safety), causing conflicting recommendations. Existing methods do not jointly provide: (i) principled inference of each agent's impli
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Candidate supply and answer selection shape the value of LLM judging in multi-agent systems#799099
- Candidate supply and answer selection shape the value of LLM judging in multi-agent systems#797676
- LLM-based Agentic Reasoning Frameworks: A Survey from Methods to Scenarios#1156205
- Beyond Symmetric Agents: Cognitive Diversity and Multi-Agent Debate in Small Language Models#1130717
- Scaling External Knowledge Input Beyond Context Windows of LLMs via Multi-Agent Collaboration#153072
Record · ID 1062037
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive