arXiv (All)
open access
Beyond Symmetric Agents: Cognitive Diversity and Multi-Agent Debate in Small Language Models
Multi-agent debate (MAD) reportedly improves reasoning and factuality over single-model inference, but prior work treats agents as symmetric peers, leaving open what drives the gains. We test the hypothesis that cognitive diversity among agents is the driver, in the setting where the question is sti
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do We Need Complex Topology Control? Distinct-Peer Random Routing Improves Cost-Efficiency in Sparse Multi-Agent Debate#1063361
- Confidence Composition for Multiagent Language Model Systems#1052201
- Argument Quality Assessment with Large Language Models: A Pairwise Bradley-Terry Approach#819377
- Argument Quality Assessment with Large Language Models: A Pairwise Bradley-Terry Approach#809384
- Agentic Multi-Turn Reasoning: A Fairness Approach#1118035
Record · ID 1130717
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive