arXiv (All)
open access
Which Reranking Conclusions Survive the Answer Interface? A Prospective Finite-Orbit Audit
Rerankers are increasingly evaluated through downstream language-model answers. This raises a retrieval-measurement question: if only the reader's answer interface changes, should we reach the same conclusion about BM25 versus BGE-v2-m3? We prospectively audit their claim-paired effect on RAGuard an
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SumRank: Aligning Summarization Models for Long-Document Listwise Reranking#998158
- Do Large Language Models Favor Recent Content? A Study on Recency Bias in LLM-Based Reranking#1050764
- Diagnosing LLM Reranker Behavior Under Fixed Evidence Pools#984997
- Decision-Oriented Recommendation Reranking: An Empirical Study of Jev#1154504
- QReason: Query-Focused Decoupled Chain-of-Thought for Efficient Passage Reranking#1105463
Record · ID 1062150
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive