arXiv (All)
open access
Designing and Analysing Argument Mining Pipelines: Towards a Comprehensive Assessment
Argument Mining (AM) transforms natural language into its underlying argument structures. This transformation is typically realized through a sequence of AM tasks that form an end-to-end AM pipeline. However, AM approaches often differ in how they conceptualize these tasks, making direct comparisons
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AMELIA: A Family of Multi-task End-to-end Language Models for Argumentation#1134026
- Annotation for computational argumentation analysis: Issues and perspectives#823895
- Argumentative reasoning patterns#776177
- Emotive Language in Argumentation#750091
- Argument Quality Assessment with Large Language Models: A Pairwise Bradley-Terry Approach#819377
Record · ID 1062235
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive