arXiv (All)
open access
Argument Quality Assessment with Large Language Models: A Pairwise Bradley-Terry Approach
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in tasks related to reasoning and judgment. However, assessing the quality of arguments requires a rigorous evaluation. We investigate the extent to which LLMs can effectively perform this task. We tested 12 open-weight LLMs of d
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Argument Quality Assessment with Large Language Models: A Pairwise Bradley-Terry Approach#809384
- Argumentation for Explainable and Globally Contestable Decision Support with LLMs#798800
- Argumentation for Explainable and Globally Contestable Decision Support with LLMs#797386
- Evaluating the Capabilities of LLMs for Persuasive Dialogue#798369
- Evaluating the Capabilities of LLMs for Persuasive Dialogue#796956
Record · ID 819377
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive