arXiv (All)
open access
The Collaboration Tax: How Much LLM Multi-Agent Systems Pay to Coordinate
Multi-agent systems built from large language models are deployed widely, yet how much performance is lost when two LLMs must coordinate rather than act alone remains unclear. We formulate the collaboration tax as the team-decentralisation loss of a two-player cooperative game with private informati
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Centralised or decentralised? Strategic implications of resource allocation models#329241
- Collective Agency and Coalitional Power in Games#732146
- Cheap Talk Stabilizes Strategic Interaction in LLM Agents#1110639
- Same Game, Different Story: A Minimal Conservative Strategic Robustness Benchmark for Large Language Model Agents#998306
- Agent-based Modeling: Equilibrium, Echo Chambers, and Efficiency in Hybrid Coevolutionary Opinion Games#1064183
Record · ID 1062988
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive