arXiv (All)
open access
Are Stated Reasoning Steps Causally Load-Bearing?
Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring assumes that the reasoning a model writes reflects the computation that directly produces its answer. Previous faithfulness metrics have been predominantly behavioral, as they simply edit the reasoning text and observe the resulting answer. However, our methodology
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Is Design Inference Epistemically Special?#691479
- ICE: Intervention-Consistent Explanation Evaluation with Statistical Grounding for LLMs#924060
- ICE: Intervention-Consistent Explanation Evaluation with Statistical Grounding for LLMs#919831
- HRIS Validation Study III - Minimal Signal Activation and Threshold-Based Reasoning Regime Induction A Reproducible Cross-Model Evaluation of Discrete Regime Activation in Language Model Inference#95700
- When Reasoning Goes Astray: Attention Dynamics of Uncontrolled Reasoning#1143418
Record · ID 1063249
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive