arXiv (All)
open access
Not What You Meant: Can LLMs Follow a Specified Negation Semantics?
Negation does not carry a uniform interpretation across domains. In legal, regulatory, and medical reasoning, the intended interpretation depends on the reading in force -- open- versus closed-world, two- versus three-valued, and credulous versus skeptical. We study which reading of negation large l
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can LLMs Learn and Apply Multi-Level Modelling Semantics? A First Empirical Study#370398
- Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Agents: A Taxonomy, an Evaluation Protocol, and an Empirical Study#984321
- Beyond Surface Forms: Symbolic Edits as a Test for Logical Reasoning with LLMs#799472
- Beyond Surface Forms: Symbolic Edits as a Test for Logical Reasoning with LLMs#798049
- Specification and Evaluation of Multi-Agent LLM Systems -- Prototype and Cybersecurity Applications#1077835
Record · ID 1064061
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive