arXiv (All)
open access
Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Agents: A Taxonomy, an Evaluation Protocol, and an Empirical Study
Large language models (LLMs) are no longer deployed only for single-turn conversation but increasingly act as agents that plan, call tools, retrieve evidence, maintain memory, and interact over long horizons, often together with other agents through multi-turn conversations. Therefore, knowing when
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When Agents Say One Thing and Do Another: Validating Elicited Beliefs from LLMs#974321
- Probability is Not Enough: Exploring and Counting Divergent Tokens for Reasoning Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs#1142368
- Probability is Not Enough: Exploring and Counting Divergent Tokens for Reasoning Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs#1122327
- Towards a Systems Foundation for Agentic Skills: Architecture, Lifecycle, and Security#798236
- Towards a Systems Foundation for Agentic Skills: Architecture, Lifecycle, and Security#796823
Record · ID 984321
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive