arXiv (All)
open access
Ask Which, Not How Good: Sizing Benchmarks Scored by an LLM
Benchmarks scored by an LLM judge routinely adjudicate differences of a tenth of a point, but the resolution of those benchmarks has never been measured. Existing sample-complexity work covers accuracy benchmarks and leaves the judged case open. Treating the system as the object of measurement, we d
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Theory of Assessability for Reasonableness#111698
- Ask, Don't Judge: Binary Questions for Interpretable LLM Evaluation and Self-Improvement#310851
- Diameter Agent Overload and the Peer Overload Report#502269
- The Gold in Bias: Maturing the AI Design Process through Verification#1077657
- Query Optimization and Evaluation via Information Theory: A Tutorial#2762
Record · ID 1064331
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive