arXiv (All)
open access
The Gold in Bias: Maturing the AI Design Process through Verification
Bias in AI systems is typically framed as a flaw to be minimized, yet it also serves as a critical indicator of underlying weaknesses in data, modeling assumptions, and system design. Existing approaches often treat bias as an isolated problem rather than as evidence that can strengthen verification
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Co-designing for Compliance: Multi-party Computation Protocols for Post-Market Fairness Monitoring in Algorithmic Hiring#1178630
- Co-designing for Compliance: Multi-party Computation Protocols for Post-Market Fairness Monitoring in Algorithmic Hiring#1178616
- Tackling the Bias Problem at the Design Stage#89849
- Do job seekers value procedure in AI hiring only for error correction? Evidence from a conjoint experiment#1110751
- Epistemic Inheritance in Artificial Intelligence: A Structural Account of Human-Limited Systems#696178
Record · ID 1077657
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive