arXiv (All)
open access
Evaluation Choices Decide the Forecasting Leaderboard: Evidence from a Production Marketplace Panel
A forecasting benchmark reports which method won. We show that the answer is set by the evaluator's choices before any model is fitted. We benchmark 24 forecasting methods and one textbook reference, including six 2025-era time series foundation models, on a production marketplace panel of 1,887 bus
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- One Capability or Many? Testing the Economic Validity of Frontier AI Evaluation#794210
- One Capability or Many? Testing the Economic Validity of Frontier AI Evaluation#790191
- Latent Inference-Time Guidance of Time Series Foundation Models#1142356
- Latent Inference-Time Guidance of Time Series Foundation Models#1122298
- Prediction Markets Legislation in the 119th Congress#621973
Record · ID 1064411
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive