arXiv (All)
open access
One Capability or Many? Testing the Economic Validity of Frontier AI Evaluation
Frontier-model leaderboards now rank systems based on economic benchmarks, tests of how well models carry out professional tasks from software engineering to banking workflows, and those rankings inform what organisations buy, what regulators scrutinise, and expectations of how work will change. Whe
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- One Capability or Many? Testing the Economic Validity of Frontier AI Evaluation#790191
- Evaluation Choices Decide the Forecasting Leaderboard: Evidence from a Production Marketplace Panel#1064411
- What Can a Leaderboard Certify? Compositional Controllability for Fair Evaluation and Training of Biomedical Literature-Review Agents#1116649
- Competitive selection of national consultant who will assist the National Food Safety Agency on the development of technical tasks for the development of IT tools. — Agriculture Governance, Growth and Resilience Investment Project (Moldova)#606767
- AISafetyBenchExplorer: A Metric-Aware Catalogue of AI Safety Benchmarks Reveals Fragmented Measurement and Weak Benchmark Governance#13134
Record · ID 794210
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive