arXiv (All)
open access
Reliable Fusion of Conflicting Experts
We study the problem of aggregating opinions from multiple black-box experts in noisy, conflict-prone settings where expert reliability varies across inputs. Static aggregation methods, such as majority voting, fail to capture this variability and often yield unreliable outcomes under disagreement.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- An Automated Machine Learning Platform for Non-experts#490964
- Evaluative Dynamics of AI Integration and Expert Performance under Epistemic Dependence across Heterogeneous Stakes#1048881
- Statistical Uncertainty Quantification for Aggregate Performance Metrics in Machine Learning Benchmarks#999638
- COLLEAGUE.SKILL: Automated AI Skill Generation via Expert Knowledge Distillation#248050
- Accuracy of Training Data and Model Outputs in Generative AI: CREATe Response to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) Consultation#818474
Record · ID 1064457
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive