arXiv (All)
open access
How Much Were You Told? Measuring External Information in Peer Reviews
Conference policies distinguish using Large Language Models (LLMs) to polish one's own review from delegating the critique, but current Artificial Text Detection (ATD) methods largely measure surface form rather than the origin of its content. We instead measure the external information carried by a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Tracking Reviews of Documents#502008
- ActReview: Rebuttal-Guided Training Data and Rubric Rewards for Actionable Peer Review Generation#986680
- When AI Reviews Train AI Reviewers: Scientific-Judgment Collapse and Mitigation#1034916
- Judging a Review by its Cover: A Reliability Analysis of LLM-based Peer Review Evaluation Metrics#1049008
- Beyond the Gatekeeper: A Framework for AI-Assisted Open Peer Review and Decentralized Scientific Evaluation#691781
Record · ID 1064585
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive