arXiv (All)
open access
How Sensitive Are LLM Leaderboard Claims to Hidden Model Selection?
LLM leaderboard gains can reflect selection among privately evaluated model variants, yet neither the number of variants nor their dependence is public. We ask how many hidden variants a published margin can support while retaining statistical evidence of a provider's advantage over a fixed comparat
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Network threats to causal inference: Variations in network position by participation in randomized controlled trials.#143309
- Moloch's Bargain: Emergent Misalignment When LLMs Compete for Audiences#1156216
- Why Better Models Can Create Riskier Systems: Evidence from LLM Agents in Financial Markets#927667
- Evaluating Variance Estimates with Relative Efficiency#1115493
- Which Models Work Well Together? Measuring Heterogeneity for LLM Team Selection#1142875
Record · ID 1064721
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive