eScholarship
metadata only
Accurate but Not Confident or Confident but Not Accurate? Cognitive Offloading Impairs Confidence Calibration in Human-AI Teams
Appropriate AI reliance requires users to accurately evaluate their own performance in order to discern whether to retain or defer responsibility. While underconfidence is a known driver of automation bias, little is known about how collaboration with AI itself influences users’ metacognition. We in
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Answer Confidence: A Controlled Audit of Self-Knowledge in a Black-Box Decision Model#1155941
- Cognitive Integrity Under Interruption: A Structural Model of Idea Degradation and Output Variability#76219
- Measuring (some aspects of) the metacognition of AI#1129212
- How Multi-Tasking Ability Impacts Performance, Workload, Situation Awareness, Stress and Trust with Simulated Imperfect Automation.#275432
- Attention, Technology, and Creativity#742687
Record · ID 1065523
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive