arXiv (All)
open access
Measuring (some aspects of) the metacognition of AI
A robust decision-making process must take into account uncertainty, especially when the choice involves inherent risks. Because artificial intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly integrated into decision-making workflows, managing uncertainty relies more and more on the metacognitive capabilitie
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Confidence in naturalistic decision making.#297415
- Rescaling Confidence: What Scale Design Reveals About LLM Metacognition#999206
- Beyond Answer Confidence: A Controlled Audit of Self-Knowledge in a Black-Box Decision Model#1155941
- Conceptualizing Uncertainty: A Concept-Based Approach to Explaining Uncertainty#965572
- A measure of metacognitive bias you can be confident in#146618
Record · ID 1129212
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive