CanLIImetadata only
Aldahleh v. Zayed
canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, onca, 2026onca667, 2026 onca 667 (canlii), 2026, onca, 667, (canlii), m57485; coa-25-cv-1014, 2026, procedure, appeals, extension of time, rules of civil procedure, r. 3.02(1), interests of justice factors (nowack, enbridge gas distribution inc. v. froese, codina), whether the moving party maintained an intention to appeal and reasonably explained delay, prejudice and merits considered, second extension refused, motion dismissed, procedure, stay of proceedings, trial management, request to stay or adjourn ongoing superior court trial, whether the court of appeal should stay the current trial dealing with parenting and other issues, observation that any request must be made to the superior court in the first instance, unnecessary to consider given dismissal, stay request not considered, family, parenting orders, jurisdiction and recognition of foreign orders, children’s law reform act, ss. 22(1)(b), 23, 41, whether appeal had merit where superior court jurisdiction was finally determined and kuwaiti custody orders were superseded, kuwaiti orders treated as irrelevant to final parenting determination, best interests assessed based on current circumstances, little merit found, motion dismissed
This document is indexed with metadata only — full text is not available in the archive for this record.
Open the official source ↗
Related documents
Record · ID 1066670
Retrieved via
Conceptio — every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.