Wood v Wood

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, bcca, 2026bcca389, 2026 bcca 389 (canlii), 2026, bcca, 389, (canlii), ca51635, 2026, family, parenting arrangements, interim variation application, adjournment generally with directions to retain a therapist, whether adjournment and counselling directions were a discretionary decision entitled to deference, best interests factors considered under family law act, s. 37(2), further information contemplated, including child’s views through counselling, leave to appeal denied, procedure, appeals, leave to appeal, court of appeal act, s. 13, court of appeal rules, rr. 11, 12, whether the order was a limited appeal order requiring leave, interim relief under the family law act and adjournment treated as limited appeal orders, characterisation based on materials seeking interim variation of final parenting orders, leave required, procedure, appeals, leave criteria, b.c. teachers’ fed. v b.c. (a.g.), goldman, sachs & co. v sessions, vancouver (city) v zhang, whether leave should be granted in the interests of justice, significance to practice and action considered, appeal not prima facie meritorious, discretionary decision, deference, leave to appeal dismissed