arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Decomposing LLM-Judge Uncertainty to Target Expert Labels
An LLM judge evaluates outputs at scale. Experts should label only where it is least sure. Its natural escalation signal conflates two uncertainties: aleatoric, real disagreement in the expert pool, which labels cannot reduce, and epistemic, the judge's ignorance, which labels do reduce. A small Bay
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Structural Limits of the Information-Theoretic Uncertainty Decomposition#1144558
- Fairness trade-offs in expert evaluation: information, judgment, and procedural design#428767
- JEV-as-a-Judge: Accept When Confident, Escalate When Unsure#1062439
- JEV-as-a-Judge: Accept When Confident, Escalate When Unsure#1043135
- Post-hoc Alignment of LLM-judges to Human Judgment Distribution#821056
Record · ID 1069917
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive