arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Universally truthful mechanisms for scheduling
We consider universally truthful randomized mechanisms for the problem of scheduling $m$ jobs on $n$ unrelated machines. We prove a lower bound on the expected approximation ratio of every such mechanism whose probability distribution has discrete support. We show that no universally truthful random
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- An $\tilde Ω(\log n \log m)$ Information-Theoretic Lower Bound for Randomized Online Set Cover#1034420
- Informational Actualism and the Foundation G: From Metaphysics to Computable Facts#170106
- Public Policy Experiments without Equipoise: When is Randomization Fair?#722448
- (Counter)factual want ascriptions and conditional belief#103663
- Error Exponents of Probabilistic Quantum Resource Distillation#974788
Record · ID 1070107
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive