arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Distortion of AI Alignment Revisited: RLHF is a Decent Utilitarian Aligner
While Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is the standard paradigm for aligning large language models with human preferences, its effectiveness in pluralistic settings has been called into question. Notably, recent work by Gölz et al. (2025) demonstrated that the \textit{distortion} --
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A flexible behavioral method for measuring human and artificial intelligence alignment using representational similarity analysis.#334594
- Longitudinal Human Computer Interaction: A Framework for Stable Cognitive Alignment in Large Language Models#715643
- The Hedonic Core Framework: A Suffering-Elimination Approach to AI Alignment#109693
- The Epistemic Limits of Machine Alignment: Preference Aggregation, Constitutional Design, and the Question of Artificial Subjectivity#689886
- Contemporary AI Alignment methodologies and constraints - literature review#696739
Record · ID 1070137
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive