arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Comparing Human Oversight Strategies for Computer-Use Agents
LLM-powered computer-use agents (CUAs) shift users from direct manipulation to supervising an unfolding action sequence, yet existing oversight research mostly evaluates static decisions rather than real-time oversight across an agent trajectory. We compared four oversight strategies with 48 partici
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do Web Agents Investigate Before They Decide?#986197
- There Is No Agency Without Attention#700458
- Philosophy of Machine Agency: Autonomy and Responsibility in AI#109344
- Who Is Behind the Harness? Fingerprinting LLMs through Agentic Behavior#1076215
- AI Snitches Get Glitches: Towards Evading Agentic Surveillance#972454
Record · ID 1070798
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive