arXiv (All)
open access
Who Is Behind the Harness? Fingerprinting LLMs through Agentic Behavior
LLMs increasingly operate through coding-agent harnesses that inspect repositories, invoke tools, and modify files. Substituting the model behind such an agent can therefore change security-relevant decisions, including whether it verifies changes or recovers safely from failures. Existing LLM finge
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LLM Agents Can Easily Tamper With Their Own Traces#1078337
- BRA-Audit: Budgeted Runtime Auditing for LLM Multi-Agent Systems via Cumulative-Exposure Audit-Point Placement#609105
- Trust but Verify? Uncovering the Security Debt of Autonomous Coding Agents#366203
- Beyond Native Success: Auditing Deployment-Interface Exposure of CLIP Backdoors#282724
- Do AI Coding Assistants Check Before They Install? A Pre-Registered Demand-Side Audit of Trust Signals in the Research Software Supply Chain#984654
Record · ID 1076215
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive