PhilArchive
open access
Collapse Theory vs. Predictive Models of Mind
This paper applies the Collapse–Definition–Resolution structure of Collapse Theory to six dominant predictive and computational models of consciousness. These frameworks — Global Workspace Theory, Integrated Information Theory, Free Energy Principle, Predictive Processing, Higher-Order Thought Theory, and Attention Schema Theory — are widely accepted in neuroscience, AI, and cognitive science. Yet each leaves a core function structurally unresolved. Collapse Theory does not critique these models rhetorically. It structurally completes them. As always, I welcome serious critique, collaboration, or debate.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Better methods won’t achieve consensus in consciousness science#75568
- The Primary Pitfalls on the Road to Understanding Consciousness#691635
- ✶ Where Is the Conscious Subject? A Dynamical Criterion for System Boundaries#716569
- Core perception needs substance, not boundaries#1081566
- Perceiving and Thinking: Inquiry into Two Types of Phenomenology#115210
Record · ID 107127
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive