arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
How User-AI Mistreatment Occurs and Matters in Conversational Systems?
Safety research often focuses on model-generated harms, but users may also direct hostility, coercion, and adversarial pressure at models. Understanding how and when that occurs is essential for accurately interpreting model behaviour, alignment drift, and real-world deployment risks. In this paper,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Contextual Contamination: A Descriptive Case Study of Drift in a Goal-Aware LLM Dialogue Amplified by Gender-Bias#204181
- Hard Negatives Reveal What Easy Negatives Hide: Cross-Lingual Harmfulness Representations Degrade with Resource Tier Under Hard Negatives#1064302
- The Design Paradox: Why Conversational AI Safety Architecture Needs Longitudinal Monitoring#681831
- ForeSight: Enhancing Risk Monitoring via Early Safety Signal Distillation#1083241
- Contextual Contamination- The Silent Drift of Large Language Models via Stored Conversation Data#94408
Record · ID 1071356
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive