PhilArchive
open access
Money Pumps for Agents Who Are Ambiguity Averse or Ambiguity Seeking
We argue that under general conditions, agents who exhibit Ellsberg-style ambiguity aversion (or ambiguity seekingness) are subject to money pumps: they will give up, for no gain, what they could have kept for free. The argument differs from existing results in three ways. First, it gains generality by depending on only minimal assumptions about the target agent. Second, unlike standard approaches that appeal to backward induction, the argument does not assume that rational agents expect that they will choose rationally after having made an irrational choice. Third, the argument is particularly simple.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Chilling out on epistemic rationality: A defense of imprecise credences#93748
- Being in a Position to Know is the Norm of Assertion#777198
- Fitting Guilt Without Blameworthiness#209871
- What Money Hides: Ecclesiastes 3:14 and the Architecture of Fear#691226
- Epistemic Modal Eavesdropping: a straight solution to a relativist challenge#764859
Record · ID 107273
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive