ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy vs. Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (ENDOVEST)
The aim of this single-center, two-arm, open-labeled, randomized controlled clinical study is to compare two surgical interventions, endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculoperitoneal shunt, in treating idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in terms of clinical improvement.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Study Comparing Shunt Placement Versus Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in the Treatment of Hydrocephalus#808049
- The Ventricular Catheter Placement Study: Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of an Ultrasound Guided Shunt Insertion Technique#913685
- Failed ventriculoperitoneal shunt as treatment of infantile hydrocephalus#376097
- ShuntCheck Versus Radionuclide in Evaluating Shunt Function in Symptomatic NPH Patients#1032902
- Guided Application of Ventricular Catheters#872333
Record · ID 1073529
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive