ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Study Comparing Shunt Placement Versus Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in the Treatment of Hydrocephalus
The main purpose of this study is to compare two types of treatment of hydrocephalus: placement of a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt versus an endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV). A second goal of this study will be to understand how the two different types of procedures, VP shunt versus ETV, affect brain blood flow and pressures. Understanding these changes is important because the investigators hope is to someday be able to predict who will better respond to one procedure or another.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ETV Versus Shunt Surgery in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus#1173056
- Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy vs. Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (ENDOVEST)#1073529
- ShuntCheck Performance Characteristics in Asymptomatic Pseudotumor Cerebri Patients#1087673
- Third Ventriculostomy Versus Shunt for Children With Hydrocephalus#914386
- ShuntCheck Versus Radionuclide in Evaluating Shunt Function in Symptomatic NPH Patients#1032902
Record · ID 808049
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive