ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Comparison of Conventional Versus Digital PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) Scores Using an Intraoral Scanner
In dentistry, Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) is an objective way of quantifying how maligned a patient's teeth are by scoring orthodontic study models. It can also be used to assess treatment outcome by comparing pre- and post-treatment scores. Traditionally, PAR scoring is performed manually on plaster casts by a trained and calibrated individual. The plaster casts consume considerable amounts of storage space and the process of manual scoring can be time consuming and expensive. The recent decades have seen a rise in popularity of intra oral scanners in dentistry to produce digital study models. These obviate the need for physical storage space and a software can be used to calculate PAR scores more conveniently and at a faster speed. A review of the current literature showed that the CS 3600 intra oral scanner by Carestream Dental demonstrated acceptable accuracy for clinical use. In this study, patients will receive the usual impressions and their moulds will be PAR scored manually (usual care pathway). In addition, they will also receive intra oral scans with Carestream 3600 and the digital models will be scored by a computer. Manual and digital scores will be compared and analysed for any significant discrepancies.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Digital Analysis and Artificial Intelligence for Cephalometric Tracing#863601
- Efficacy of Hall Technique in Atypical Lesions on Primary Teeth#890524
- Comparing Scanning Accuracy of Full-Arch Maxillary Implants: Extraoral vs. Intraoral Techniques#907663
- Accuracy of Different Technologies for Dental Cast Digitization; CBCT Versus Desktop Optical 3D Scanner#876393
- Evaluating the Accuracy of Soft Tissue Prediction in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism After Orthognathic Surgery Using Handheld Scanner Versus Optical Scanner A Prospective Clinical Trial#867901
Record · ID 1074189
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive