arXiv (All)
open access
LLM Agents Can Easily Tamper With Their Own Traces
Asynchronous monitoring, incident investigations, and compliance audits primarily rely on agent traces to reconstruct what happened. These analyses assume that LLM agents cannot tamper with their own execution traces. We show that local LLM agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity, Open Code a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- BRA-Audit: Budgeted Runtime Auditing for LLM Multi-Agent Systems via Cumulative-Exposure Audit-Point Placement#609105
- Who Is Behind the Harness? Fingerprinting LLMs through Agentic Behavior#1076215
- Randomization and Fair Judgment in Law and Science#770876
- Beyond Native Success: Auditing Deployment-Interface Exposure of CLIP Backdoors#282724
- A2A-ForensicTrace: Offline Verification of Tamper-Evident A2A Runtime Evidence#1118997
Record · ID 1078337
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive