arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Do job seekers value procedure in AI hiring only for error correction? Evidence from a conjoint experiment
Employers increasingly delegate initial screening to automated systems, which in many cases reject an application before any human reads it. Acceptance of such systems plausibly depends both on how well they perform and on the procedure that produces the decision. Prior studies rarely vary procedure
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- PACE: Towards Surfacing Hidden Conflicts in User Requests#925638
- Algorithmic Monocultures in Hiring#229523
- The Gold in Bias: Maturing the AI Design Process through Verification#1077657
- A Tutorial on Prompt Engineering: From Messy Thoughts to AI Workflows#1036932
- Validation of myStrength's Macropersonalization Engine#883274
Record · ID 1110751
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive