arXiv (All)
open access
Between the Commits: Process, Error, and Claim Reliability in a Wholly AI-Authored Codebase
We present: (i) a new dataset consisting of the full development history of a 21,000-line Python tool built entirely by Claude AI, with no human-authored code or tests, (ii) two code-provenance tracing tools, (iii) three taxonomies for instruction intent, commit provenance, and response reliability,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Learning from 53.6K Real-World Developer Edits of AI-Generated Code#1109816
- princeton-nlp/SWE-bench#786982
- On Automated and Explainable Provenance of AI-Generated Code#424034
- How Researchers Use and Verify AI Coding Assistants: Tasks and Validation Practices in Scientific Programming#1036459
- How Researchers Use and Verify AI Coding Assistants: Tasks and Validation Practices in Scientific Programming#1006921
Record · ID 1077671
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive