arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Learning from 53.6K Real-World Developer Edits of AI-Generated Code
Imperfections in AI-generated code require that software developers modify the generated code manually, or by re-prompting an AI programming assistant. Manual code edits provide more realistic and granular information on editing behavior than Git commits, which only contain final successful code sni
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ten simple rules for effective use of generative AI for code development in environmental science#676220
- How Researchers Use and Verify AI Coding Assistants: Tasks and Validation Practices in Scientific Programming#1036459
- How Researchers Use and Verify AI Coding Assistants: Tasks and Validation Practices in Scientific Programming#1006921
- Between the Commits: Process, Error, and Claim Reliability in a Wholly AI-Authored Codebase#1077671
- SWE-bench Science: Can Coding Agents Resolve Engineering Tasks in Science?#820620
Record · ID 1109816
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive