arXiv (All)
open access
Analyzing Defensive Misdirection Against Model-Guided Automated Attacks on Agentic AI Systems
Agentic AI systems increasingly rely on language-model components to interpret instructions, process external data, invoke tools, and coordinate with other agents. These capabilities make prompt-injection and jailbreak attacks more consequential, especially as attackers adopt model-guided automati
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Rethinking Indirect Prompt Injection as a Test-Time Search Problem#927781
- CausalArmor: Efficient Indirect Prompt Injection Guardrails via Causal Attribution#1155115
- Security of World-Model-Based Embodied AI: A Lifecycle of Threats, Defenses, and Evaluation#414036
- Divide and Inject: Can Agents Reconstruct an Indirect Prompt Injection from Fragments?#1131777
- Analyzing Defensive Misdirection Against Model-Guided Automated Attacks on Agentic AI Systems#290516
Record · ID 1077900
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive