OSF
open access
Evaluating the discrepancies in funding metadata across bibliographic and administrative databases: the case of South Korea’s public research funding
Funding metadata underpins the identification of the relationship between research funding and outputs, yet its coverage and accuracy vary across databases. I examine discrepancies in funding metadata for South Korean government-funded research by comparing records from South Korea’s National Scienc
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluating the discrepancies in funding metadata across bibliographic and administrative databases: the case of South Korea’s public research funding#1081951
- Assessing Funders’ Databases Against Bibliographic Sources: A Study of Interoperability, Metadata Quality, and Coverage Using South Korea’s National R&D Database#1081963
- Assessing Funders’ Databases Against Bibliographic Sources: A Study of Interoperability, Metadata Quality, and Coverage Using South Korea’s National R&D Database#1081956
- Girls just wanna have funds: a new Transparent Reporting Scale for evaluating grant data reporting from funding agencies#126938
- The shape of NSF openness to newcomers: same share, fewer doors#1180128
Record · ID 1081427
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive