PhilArchive
open access
The Most Powerful Mechanism of Logical Thinking Survived in Evolution: Universal Human Relationship–Based Reasoning as a Blueprint for AGI
Current AI is trapped in the Stochastic Paradigm: high-dimensional probabilities produce hallucinations, inconsistency, and fragile reasoning. To address these issues, this paper introduces the rule-based mechanism of human logical thinking, which follows a set of universal rules to perform the corresponding types of thinking. Behind this lies a mechanism through which neural activity follows the objective interrelationships to establish the corresponding conceptual relations within the neural network. Thus, the relationships of serial, parallel, convergence, divergence and symmetry are correspondingly translated into causal thinking, parallel thinking (analogy), convergent thinking (inductive reasoning and generalization), divergent thinking (deductive reasoning) and symmetrical thinking (opposite thinking). The investigation of logical thinking is part of the much broader ontological research project on A Theory of Everything. This research reveals that the rules of logical thinking are the fundamental rules underlying everything in the universe. These rules include serial, transition, transition point, continuation, discontinuation, parallel, similarity, commonality, difference, common mechanism, convergence, divergence, contraction, expansion, symmetry, asymmetry, limitation, limitlessness, order, disorder, hierarchy and interconnectedness. These concepts can be represented by an ontological framework: a geometric model – the Fundamental Interrelationships Model (IRM) and its associated ontological-mathematical formulation. This framework can be applied to logical thinking to the various issues of AI, such as Epistemic Instability (Hallucinations), Stochastic Variance (Inconsistency), Pattern Overgeneralization, Input Fragility (Prompt Sensitivity), Recursive Decay and so on…
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- On cognitive systems and their logic#688976
- From Extended to Amplified: The Generative Mind in the Age of LLMs#103817
- The Evolution of Design Thinking in the Age of Foundation Models: Revisiting Verganti’s Framework (2020-2025)#75398
- Thought without systematicity? Evaluating reasoning models on rule induction tasks#1083437
- The Misnomer of 'Natural Language Processing': A Critical Examination of Computational Linguistics' Foundational Category Errors#715738
Record · ID 695834
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive