PsyArXiv
metadata only
Does Generative AI Make Us Think Alike? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Homogenization Effects in Human–AI Co-Creation
Does generative AI make us think alike? As human–AI co-creation becomes embedded in creative practice, concerns have emerged that creative outputs may exhibit homogenization, as reduced diversity of meanings, across users, even when individual creativity improves. We address this concern through a s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Homogenization Effects of Large Language Models on Human Creative Ideation#328705
- Better Late Than Early: How AI Integration Timing Shapes Creativity Judgments#31097
- Creativity: Progress and Potential#772466
- Why Large Language Models and Humans Converge and Diverge in Evaluating Creativity#1118663
- A Paradigm for Probing Neural Dynamics of Creative Cognition#148885
Record · ID 1092198
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive