ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Videolaryngoscopy at Unanticipated Difficult Airway
Glottic visualization, intubation success, complications and accidental esophageal intubation rate of direct laryngoscopy (DL) and videolaryngoscopy (VL) were compared in patients with UDA.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Airway Evaluation by McGrath Videolaryngoscope#844766
- Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopes in Difficult Airway#807291
- Video Laryngoscope Versus USB Borescope in Difficult Intubation#1008563
- The Effect of The Use of a Videolaryngoscope and/or Stylet on Intubation Time in Obese Patients#1125517
- A Comparison of C-MAC Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation#866549
Record · ID 1094970
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive