arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
DepthBenchCAD: When Does Deeper Auditing Yield More Reliable Conclusions?
Generative CAD models are expected to remain behaviorally correct after parameter edits, so increasing the number of edit checks is often treated as a direct route to more reliable evaluation. Under a fixed budget, however, auditing each program more thoroughly reduces the number of tasks and indepe
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DepthBenchCAD: When Does Deeper Auditing Yield More Reliable Conclusions?#919490
- The Fixation of Belief in Machines: Disciplined Contestation as an Alternative to Mutual Adversarial Oversight#695945
- DeepRewind: Predicting and Repairing Premature Commitments in Deep Research Agents#1131186
- When Models Edit Too Much: On the Fidelity of Minimal Code Edits#926906
- Is Design Inference Epistemically Special?#691479
Record · ID 1099927
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive