ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Intranasal vs Buccal vs Intramuscular Midazolam for the Home and Emergency Treatment of Acute Seizures
A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing patient/ ER physician satisfaction and ease of administration of 3 non IV routes of midazolam as a rescue medication for seizure control. Study population included children with known seizure disorder who were prescribed midazolam by pediatric neurologist at home and those presenting to ER with following inclusion and exclusion criteria
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Intramuscular Midazolam Versus Intravenous Diazepam for Acute Seizure in Children#852679
- A Multicenter Open-label Study Investigating the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Aripiprazole IM Depot Formulation (OPC-14597 IMD) During Repeated Administration by Injection Into the Deltoid Muscle in Patients With Schizophrenia#1088074
- Nasogastric Tube Insertion Using Midazolam in the Emergency Department#910227
- Ketamine Versus Midazolam for Prehospital Agitation#1094292
- A Phase III Study of Remimazolam in Patients Undergoing Bronchoscopy#839697
Record · ID 1100679
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive